Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes R888R vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN A048 is ahead, 62–47

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes R888R
Tire AToyo

Proxes R888R

Summer tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 31 · 80 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN A048
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN A048

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 9 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    ADVAN A048 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6374

    Proxes R888R: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Proxes R888R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 30

    Wet

    ADVAN A048 +30
    60
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 40 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online1556

    Proxes R888R: 60% × 39.9 (est.) + 40% × 15 = 30

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Proxes R888R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 33

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)–
    Reviews found online10–

    Proxes R888R: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33

    No road tests of snow for Proxes R888R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    ADVAN A048 +4
    57
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4552

    Proxes R888R: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 44.7 = 53

    ADVAN A048: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 51.7 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes R888R or ADVAN A048. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 49

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online24–

    Proxes R888R: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 23.8 = 49

    No road tests of noise for Proxes R888R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 40

    Treadwear

    ADVAN A048 +12
    52
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online2343

    Proxes R888R: 60% × 51.1 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 40

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 42.8 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes R888R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888RADVAN A048
    Reviews found online–67
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes R888R vs Yokohama ADVAN A048: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes R888RYokohama ADVAN A048
Relative Score 47 62
Dry 65 72
Wet 30 60
Snow 33 –
Comfort 53 57
Noise 49 –
Treadwear 40 52
Handling (owners) – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Proxes R888R

± 8

ADVAN A048

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes R888R

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B ADVAN A048

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
  • High level of steering feedback and handling precision
  • Progressive breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear during track sessions
  • High road noise levels
  • Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN A048 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes R888R B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available56—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—
Tread depth4 - 7/32″—
UTQG100 AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes R888R

Yokohama ADVAN A048

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A048 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama ADVAN A048 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 60 vs 30 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 52 vs 40 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 72 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 57 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes R888R
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A048

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes R888R or ADVAN A048?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes R888R or ADVAN A048?

Yokohama ADVAN A048, 60 vs 30 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes R888R or ADVAN A048?

Yokohama ADVAN A048, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes R888R or ADVAN A048?

Yokohama ADVAN A048, 57 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes R888R or ADVAN A048?

Yokohama ADVAN A048, 52 vs 40 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology