Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN A048 vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Advan A050 leads, 62–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN A048
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN A048

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 11 reviews

Yokohama Advan A050
Tire BYokohama

Advan A050

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Advan A050 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6673

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    Advan A050: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 71

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Advan A050 +4
    60
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5155

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 56

    Advan A050: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 51

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online37–

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 37.4 = 51

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Advan A050 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4757

    ADVAN A048: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.8 = 54

    Advan A050: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN A048. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    ADVAN A048 +5
    47
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4335

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.2 = 52

    Advan A050: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Advan A050 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A048Advan A050
    Reviews found online6271
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN A048 vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A048Yokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 59 62
Dry 67 71
Wet 56 60
Snow 51 –
Comfort 54 61
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 52 47
Handling (owners) 62 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ADVAN A048

± 8

Advan A050

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN A048

Pros

  • Insane levels of dry grip once warmed up
  • Progressive and easy to control at the limit on compatible platforms
  • Excellent steering feedback and precise handling

Cons

  • Short tread life with rapid wear after just a few track sessions
  • Tricky tire pressure management and temperature control
  • Prone to hydroplaning and handling excitement in deep puddles
All owner themes in the ADVAN A048 review

Tire B Advan A050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A050 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A048 B · Yokohama Advan A050
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth6/32″—
UTQG60 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN A048

Yokohama Advan A050

Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan A050 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A048 if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama ADVAN A048 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 61 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 52 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 71 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A048
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN A048 or Advan A050?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN A048 or Advan A050?

Yokohama Advan A050, 60 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN A048 or Advan A050?

Yokohama Advan A050, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN A048 or Advan A050?

Yokohama Advan A050, 61 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN A048 or Advan A050?

Yokohama ADVAN A048, 52 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology