Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes RA1 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 11 + 588 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac Pro is ahead, 72–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire AToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Quatrac Pro

All Season

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Proxes RA1 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 72 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7975

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Quatrac Pro +19
    83
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 65 (est.)84
    Reviews found online6180

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 80 = 83

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 49

    Snow

    Quatrac Pro +6
    55
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 58 (est.)48
    Reviews found online3466

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 65.8 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Quatrac Pro +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6677

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 77.2 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Quatrac Pro +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online7074

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 73.6 = 75

    No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Proxes RA1 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)55
    Reviews found online6869

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 69.2 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac Pro +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes RA1Quatrac Pro
    Reviews found online7374
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes RA1 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes RA1Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Relative Score 66 72
Dry 75 74
Wet 64 83
Snow 49 55
Comfort 67 75
Noise 68 75
Treadwear 67 61
Handling (owners) 73 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes RA1

Quatrac Pro

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

Tire B Quatrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
  • Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
  • Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac Pro review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes RA1 B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available797
Rim diameters15″ – 18″17″ – 22″
Tread depth8/32″—
UTQG100 AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes RA1

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac Pro — better wet, comfort and noise. Pick the Toyo Proxes RA1 if treadwear matters most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 83 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 68 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 83 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 55 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 68 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes RA1 or Quatrac Pro?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology