Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 33 reviews
Toyo R1R vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 33 + 2,201 owner reviews. How we score
R1R leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,201 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
R1R +574Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 85 68 R1R: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.4 = 79
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
R1R +1067Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 80 64 R1R: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison36Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online – 12 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
R1R +662Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 68 61 R1R: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 67.8 = 68
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
No road tests of comfort for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 60 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 59.5 = 68
-
59
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +1069Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 55 59 R1R: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
83
Handling (owners)
R1R +1172Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 83 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source R1R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo R1R | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 70 |
| Dry | 79 | 74 |
| Wet | 77 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
R1R
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A R1R
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling and communicative steering feedback
- Strong wet-weather performance for a performance-oriented tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear due to soft compound
- Prone to overheating and 'greasy' performance during prolonged track use
- Increased road noise compared to standard street tires
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Toyo R1R
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo R1R | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 140 AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo R1R
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Toyo R1R — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you.
Toyo R1R scores 83 vs 72 on handling.
Toyo R1R scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 59 on treadwear.
Toyo R1R scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
R1R or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, R1R or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Toyo R1R, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, R1R or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Toyo R1R, 79 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, R1R or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Toyo R1R, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, R1R or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology