Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Hi Trac 2 is ahead, 70–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Hi Trac 2 +761Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 58 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Hi Trac 2 +1757Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 75 53 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
Hi Trac 2 +465Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 70 62 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Hi Trac 2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Hi Trac 2 +265Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 64 Hi Trac 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Hi Trac 2 +1358Why this score
Source Hi Trac 2 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 71 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 61 |
| Dry | 68 | 61 |
| Wet | 74 | 57 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Hi Trac 2
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Hi Trac 2
Pros
- Strong wet weather grip and braking performance
- Quiet operation compared to factory-fitted alternatives
- Good traction for acceleration and braking
Cons
- Poor tread longevity, with some users reporting significant wear under 10,000 miles
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'wobbly' sensation or excessive flex during cornering
- Lack of lateral grip in dry conditions
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Vredestein Hi Trac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 74 vs 57 on wet.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 71 vs 58 on handling.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 68 vs 61 on dry.
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hi Trac 2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, Hi Trac 2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 74 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Hi Trac 2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Hi Trac 2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Vredestein Hi Trac 2, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Hi Trac 2 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology