Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 7 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac 2 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac 2

Quatrac 2

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Quatrac 2 +7
    62
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)59
    Reviews found online6968

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.5 + 40% × 68.1 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Quatrac 2 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7372

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.4 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Quatrac 2 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7070

    Quatrac 2: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70

    BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.5 + 60% × 69.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–64
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 2 +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7152

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 69

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 51.6 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth RV02 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Reviews found online6169
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Quatrac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Quatrac 2Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Relative Score 69 65
Dry 69 62
Wet 72 69
Snow 66 –
Comfort 70 66
Noise – 65
Treadwear 69 61
Handling (owners) 61 69
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Quatrac 2

± 10

BluEarth RV02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
  • Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
All owner themes in the Quatrac 2 review

Tire B BluEarth RV02

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
  • Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
All owner themes in the BluEarth RV02 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac 2 B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—17″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac 2

Yokohama BluEarth RV02

Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac 2 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth RV02 if handling matters most to you. Vredestein Quatrac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 69 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 69 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 69 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology