tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Vredestein Quatrac 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 13 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Kinergy 4S and Quatrac 2 are level at 69.

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy 4S Check price on Amazon · Quatrac 2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 8

Tests 67 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 13 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Vredestein Quatrac 2
Tire BVredestein

Quatrac 2

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6969

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71.1 = 73

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7664

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.2 + 40% × 76 = 70

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Quatrac 2 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6770

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67

    Quatrac 2: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 2 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6271

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 61.9 = 62

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy 4S +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Reviews found online6461
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SQuatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67–
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SVredestein Quatrac 2
Relative Score 69 69
Dry 69 69
Wet 73 72
Snow 70 66
Comfort 67 70
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 62 69
Handling (owners) 64 61
Efficiency 67 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Kinergy 4S

± 8

Quatrac 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Tire B Quatrac 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
  • Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
All owner themes in the Quatrac 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Vredestein Quatrac 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available67—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Vredestein Quatrac 2

Too close to call: Hankook Kinergy 4S and Vredestein Quatrac 2 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Kinergy 4S is stronger on snow. Vredestein Quatrac 2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Vredestein Quatrac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 69 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 70 vs 66 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S or Quatrac 2?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 69 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology