Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 58 reviews
Vredestein Quatrac 3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 58 + 1,627 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +775Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 69 76 Quatrac 3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 76.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Quatrac 3 +372Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 78 78 Quatrac 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 77.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
76
Snow
Quatrac 3 +274Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 80 71 Quatrac 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 71.3 = 74
No road tests of snow for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +473Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 76 Quatrac 3: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison76Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 77 Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 76.5 = 76
-
66
Treadwear
Geolandar A/T G015 +470Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 73 Quatrac 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +374Why this score
Source Quatrac 3 Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 71 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac 3 | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 73 |
| Dry | 68 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 72 |
| Snow | 76 | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Quatrac 3
Geolandar A/T G015
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Quatrac 3 | Geolandar A/T G015 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #35/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test | #1/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Quatrac 3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slush
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable and progressive handling limits
Cons
- Develops significant road noise or rhythmic droning as tread wears down
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier vehicles
- Slightly reduced dry-pavement grip and sharper cornering response compared to dedicated summer tires
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Vredestein Quatrac 3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac 3 | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 90 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Vredestein Quatrac 3
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Narrow edge: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 3 if wet matters most to you.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.
Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 75 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Vredestein Quatrac 3, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Quatrac 3 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology