Vredestein Quatrac Lite looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac Lite vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 7 + 588 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Quatrac Lite 74, Quatrac Pro 75.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Quatrac Pro

All Season

± 6

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Quatrac Pro +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 71 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7575

    Quatrac Lite: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 74.7 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac Lite. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Quatrac Pro +7
    84
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 76 (est.)85
    Reviews found online8082

    Quatrac Lite: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 81.8 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac Lite. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests–48
    Reviews found online–65

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 65 = 55

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Quatrac Pro +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7578

    Quatrac Lite: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.9 = 73

    Quatrac Pro: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 78.2 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for Quatrac Lite. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests–76
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Quatrac Lite +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)55
    Reviews found online7469

    Quatrac Lite: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 68.8 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac Lite. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac Lite +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Reviews found online7573
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac LiteQuatrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests–50
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Quatrac Lite vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Quatrac LiteVredestein Quatrac Pro
Relative Score 74 75
Dry 73 74
Wet 77 84
Snow – 55
Comfort 73 76
Noise – 72
Treadwear 71 60
Handling (owners) 75 73
Efficiency – 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Quatrac Lite

± 6

Quatrac Pro

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryQuatrac LiteQuatrac ProΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2014 All Season Tyre Test #9/11 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac Lite

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and ride comfort
  • Strong traction in snow and slush conditions
  • Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • Reduced steering sharpness and responsiveness
  • Sidewall stiffness can lead to poor absorption of low-frequency road noise
  • Lack of progressive handling limits when pushed to the limit
All owner themes in the Quatrac Lite review

Tire B Quatrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
  • Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
  • Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac Pro review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac Lite B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—97
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac Lite

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Too close to call: Vredestein Quatrac Lite and Vredestein Quatrac Pro are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Quatrac Lite is stronger on treadwear. Vredestein Quatrac Pro is stronger on wet and comfort. Vredestein Quatrac Lite rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac Lite scores 71 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 84 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 76 vs 73 on comfort.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac Lite
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac Lite or Quatrac Pro?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac Lite or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 84 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac Lite or Quatrac Pro?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac Lite or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 76 vs 73 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac Lite or Quatrac Pro?

Vredestein Quatrac Lite, 71 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology