Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 24 road tests and 588 + 3,636 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Quatrac Pro 71, Kinergy 4S2 70.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
Tests 79 · 24 tests Owners 60 · 3,636 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)
“New Tyres - Kia dealership recommend Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 H750 215/55R17 98W Just had my 40,000 service at my local Kia dealership for my ‘22 E Niro. I am going to get my tyres changed elsewhere to save a few £££’s but am just wondering if the Hankooks are a good tyre? I am looking at around £140-160 per tyre and wondering if this is a good tyre for the price or if anyone has better suggestion for similar price or cheaper?”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 23 tests | 73 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 56 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 | 90% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 99% | 99% |
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 74.7 = 74
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 56.4 = 72
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 23 tests | 85 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 64 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 94% | 93% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–1 | 99% | 94% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–1 | 100% | 98% |
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 81.8 = 84
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 64.3 = 78
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 18 tests | 48 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 61 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 93% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 97% | 98% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 87% | 89% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 95% | 96% |
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 65 = 55
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 79 + 40% × 61.3 = 72
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests | 73 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 55 |
Quatrac Pro: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 78.2 = 76
Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 76.6 + 60% × 54.8 = 64
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 18 tests | 76 | 66 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 99% | 99% |
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro or Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 9 tests | 55 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 60 |
| Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 69% | 68% |
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 68.8 = 60
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 59.5 = 67
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 73 | 56 |
| Source | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 18 tests | 50 | 54 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 83% | 86% |
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac Pro | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 74 | 72 |
| Wet | 84 | 78 |
| Snow | 55 | 72 |
| Comfort | 76 | 64 |
| Noise | 72 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 56 |
| Efficiency | 50 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Quatrac Pro
Kinergy 4S2
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Vredestein Quatrac Pro finished ahead 4 times and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 2 times.
| Discipline | Category | Quatrac Pro | Kinergy 4S2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% | 94% | −3.2 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | −0.2 | 1–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #2/8 · 2024 Promobil Commercial Winter Tire Test R17 | 95% #3/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 78% #10/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 93% | +1.2 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% | 94% | +4.9 | 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% | 100% | −0.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 98% | +1.7 | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 90% #2/8 · 2024 Promobil Commercial Winter Tire Test R17 | 91% #6/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | – | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 91% #7/7 · 2020 ADAC SUV All Season Tyre Test | 92% #11/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 93% | 95% | −1.7 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Snow Circle | Snow | 84% #8/8 · 2024 Motorhome Camper Van All Season Tyre Test | 95% #6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% | 98% | −0.4 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 87% | 89% | −2.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 95% | 96% | −0.6 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 80% #2/6 · 2022 Gute Fahrt All-Season Tire Test R18 | 88% #8/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | +0.9 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 69% | 68% | +1.0 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 83% | 86% | −3.0 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 79% | 84% | −5.1 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #15/16 | #12/16 | – | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Value | Cost | 64% | 67% | −3.0 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/12 | #8/12 | – | 4–2 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community members frequently view the Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 as a solid, budget-friendly alternative to premium all-weather tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2, highlighting its strong wet traction and good snow performance for the price. However, users report mixed experiences regarding tread longevity, with some noting rapid or uneven wear, as well as drawbacks such as highway humming noise, a stiff ride, and twitchy handling on ice.
“Hankook Worn out after 15k miles Took my car in for a standard tire rotation and was informed all 4 tires only had 4/32 of tread remaining left. I was shocked. I've only put about 15k miles on in the 2.5 years I've had the tires. I don't drive aggressively at all. Mix of city and highway. Anyways, I got about a 75% credit on the Hankook Kinergy 4s2 all weather tires and only paid about $70 out of pocket towards my new tires (plus $90 balancing and mounting fee)! I went with the Falken Aklimate that were about $150 a tire. Just wanted to share my story. Can the softer rubber in all weather tires cause them to wear out faster in the summer? Only other thing I can think of is my car was parked outside for 2 summers in a south facing parking lot so maybe the sun just baked them and cause the tread to wear faster? But I would think that would be more dry rot related than tread wear. Read more”
“Tire recommendations E-class Hi all, I've been enjoying my first E-class for a couple months now. The only thing that has been bothering me is the loud noise the tires make at about 130 kph. I've ruled everything out so I'm really certain it is just the tires. They are hankook kinergy 4s2 h750 all seasons, so a bit of noise is to be expected but these really make a loud humming noise at highway speeds. Does anyone have recommendation for quiet all season tires? They do need to have the 3pmsf certifaction. My sizes are front: 245/40 R19 & back: 275/35 R19. Read more”
“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”
Based on 33 community posts
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac Pro | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 97 | 95 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 41 | 41 |
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Too close to call: Vredestein Quatrac Pro and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Quatrac Pro is stronger on handling, comfort and wet. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is stronger on snow, treadwear and efficiency.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 73 vs 56 on handling.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 72 vs 55 on snow.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 76 vs 64 on comfort.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 67 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 84 vs 78 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 72 vs 55 on our snow score.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 72 vs 66 on our noise score.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 76 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 54 vs 50 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology