tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 588 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac Pro is ahead, 75–61

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac Pro or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Tire AVredestein

Quatrac Pro

All Season

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Quatrac Pro +13
    61
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7558

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 83

    Wet

    Quatrac Pro +26
    57
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests84≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8053

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 80 = 83

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests48–
    Reviews found online66–

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 65.8 = 55

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Quatrac Pro +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7762

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 77.2 = 75

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 75

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online74–

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 73.6 = 75

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests55≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6964

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 69.2 = 61

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac Pro +16
    58
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7458
Scores at a glance
CategoryVredestein Quatrac ProYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 75 61
Dry 74 61
Wet 83 57
Snow 55 –
Comfort 75 65
Noise 75 –
Treadwear 61 65
Handling (owners) 74 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Quatrac Pro

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
  • Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
  • Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac Pro review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac Pro B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available97—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac Pro — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 83 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 74 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 74 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac Pro or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac Pro or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 83 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac Pro or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac Pro or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac Pro or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology