Tests 81 · 16 tests Owners 78 · 1,578 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 16 + 0 road tests and 1,578 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac is ahead, 80–70
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 16 tests Owners 78 · 1,578 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 80 |
Quatrac: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 82
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / – tests | 94 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 84 | 69 |
Quatrac: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 83.9 = 90
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 61 |
Quatrac: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 74
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 67 |
Quatrac: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 73.8 = 73
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests | 80 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 68 |
Quatrac: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 75
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 61 |
Quatrac: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 75.7 = 74
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 79 | 79 |
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 70 |
| Dry | 82 | 75 |
| Wet | 90 | 69 |
| Snow | 74 | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 68 |
| Noise | 75 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Quatrac
Advan Neova AD08
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Quatrac | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 | #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.
“I have used Vredestein Quatrac on my 2012 Camry Hybrid XLE. The car has about 130K miles on it and about 50k on the Vredestein Quatrac. Amazing tires ! M+S rated and excellent traction and grip in rain and snow. Wear a bit faster though. Lasted about 45k miles on my Camry . These are my preferred tires for this car.”
“I would actually disagree with that. All OEM tires are bad. But those Japanese Turanza EL450 are one of the better ones out there. They were super harsh in the beginning, got better over time. Still quite stiff and all that. However there are two things to point out: You got a slightly wider tire. If you know what you are doing, then good for you. For others, I'd generally suggest to stay with OEM sizing (yes there are barely any tires available in that size). Pointless to compare soft All Weather tires with Eco-specific All-Season tires. Those eco all seasons always will be stiffer. For others, may I suggest Vredestein Quatrac Pro, they are available in the factory size and I run them on my other car - they are amazing and IMO much better than CrossClimate2”
“My wife has been using Vredestein Quatracs for 4 years now. She has done 60,000 km so far (mostly commuting and school runs, but also several longer trips). The tyres still have plenty od tread. During this winter they will reach the winter indicators and they will definitely last through the next summer, so it will be more than 4.5 years and approximately 70,000 km. So far, they have been very good, quiet, very grippy in the wet and fine even in the occasional snow. The car is a small crossover - Opel Mokka, so pretty different to your 325i :) I can definitely recommend them!”
Based on 64 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Vredestein Quatrac
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Vredestein Quatrac scores 90 vs 69 on wet.
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 63 on treadwear.
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 65 on snow.
Vredestein Quatrac scores 75 vs 67 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Quatrac, 90 vs 69 on our wet score.
Vredestein Quatrac, 82 vs 75 on our dry score.
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 65 on our snow score.
Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 67 on our noise score.
Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology