Tests 81 · 17 tests Owners 79 · 1,583 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 3 road tests and 1,583 + 6,409 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac leads, 81–78 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 17 tests Owners 79 · 1,583 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”
Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 6,409 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)
“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 3 tests | 83 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 87 |
Quatrac: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 81
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.2 = 80
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 3 tests | 96 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 91 |
Quatrac: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 85.9 = 92
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 91.4 = 81
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 1 tests | 75 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 71 |
Quatrac: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 71.3 = 77
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests | 71 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 83 |
Quatrac: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 74.7 = 73
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.7 + 60% × 83.4 = 80
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests | 78 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 79 |
Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 74
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 79.3 = 75
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 71 |
Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 78.2 = 75
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 83 |
| Source | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests | 73 | – |
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 78 |
| Dry | 81 | 80 |
| Wet | 92 | 81 |
| Snow | 74 | 77 |
| Comfort | 73 | 80 |
| Noise | 74 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 83 |
| Efficiency | 73 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Quatrac
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Quatrac | ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 99% #2/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Circle | Dry | 99% #3/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 97% #3/4 · Tire Rack Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 88% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 92% #3/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 99% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 90% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 97% #2/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 91% #13/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | 100% #1/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 93% #7/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 92% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 98% #2/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 78% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 99% #2/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 99% #4/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 88% #2/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 96% #4/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 90% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 94% #2/4 · Tire Rack Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 | #3/5 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.
“23 Model Y LR....just did my first tire change at 41k miles from stock Contis to Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Better all the way around, no foam. There is not much of a road noise difference, maybe a bit louder going over concrete sections on some highways. I don't buy into the foam theory. Noise comes from tire composition and tread hitting varying surfaces. Every tire will give a different sound and sound level, foam or not.”
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Experience?? Has anyone had experience with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ tires? I got them off Tire Rack because they are supposedly EV rated... only to later find out there are specific Quadtrac EV tires (not listed on Tire Rack). I know I'll have a hit on range on my 2022 Bolt EUV because I have the original Michelins on the front and Quadtrac+s in the back but it seems very unpredictable (only reason for this is that old fronts were in VERY bad shape and wanted two new tires for safety with a 2year old). Read more”
“The last week or so here we have received about 12-15 inches of snow. I have these on my 2003 Forester and must say they dig through the snow very well. The only thing that I have found is that they seem a little slick when stopping. Don't stop as well as the Blizzaks on the wife's Galant, but then again they are not a dedicated winter tire either. Have put about 3500 miles on them since July and must say for an all season tire they have performed well in all conditions.”
Based on 64 community posts
The community widely praises the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus as a top-tier ultra-high-performance all-season tire, often comparing it favorably to Michelin competitors. Users frequently highlight its exceptional wet traction, comfortable and quiet ride quality, and surprising winter capabilities for an all-season tire. While a few note softer sidewalls or minor balancing quirks, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive regarding daily driving performance and value.
“New Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus on 2023 MYP (pics + first impressions) After a summer of traveling to visit family and kids on AAU travel teams it was time for some new rubber. Looked down at my rears a few days ago and saw the threads on the inside of the right tire. I used the Tesla community here on Reddit and locked in on the DWS. PepBoys was able to get them in less than 24 hours and even offered a 10% discount. I definitely noticed a smoother ride so far and I would argue a bit more traction. I’ve only had them on for a day so I’ll have to see how much range loss I’ll experience and if they perform better or worse when pushed. I think for $1,500 dollars installed I didn’t do too bad. Plus I believe I have a quality replacement from the OEM that my MYP came with. Anyone else running the DWS06 Plus on their MYP? How’s your long-term wear or efficiency? Read more”
“Yep the set on mine are approaching 5 yrs/50K miles since being put on and tread depth is averaging 4/32". Will be replacing them in the next few months and no doubt will go back with the same exact thing. Definitely the best performing/most even wearing tire I've had on any vehicle for decades regardless of brand.”
“Got these for a steal I was looking for a 18 inch winter wheels set for my 997.1 S These came up and got them for $650 - full set with tires! Tires are Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus all-seasons - made in 0125 and have 90% thread on them. I was going to donate the tires and buy proper winter tires like Michelin Alpine, but google ai tells me these are better if the roads are clean so I might drive them when I put my summer tires away.”
Based on 139 community posts
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac | B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 120 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 - 740 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Vredestein Quatrac
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS if comfort, handling and snow matter most to you.
Vredestein Quatrac scores 92 vs 81 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 73 on comfort.
Vredestein Quatrac scores 75 vs 69 on treadwear.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 83 vs 77 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Quatrac, 92 vs 81 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 77 vs 74 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology