Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 8 + 1,593 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac is ahead, 80–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,593 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Quatrac +1181Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 71 78 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.6 = 81
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Quatrac +2291Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 95 Reviews found online 68 85 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
Quatrac: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 85.2 = 91
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Quatrac +874Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 62 73 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66
Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 72.9 = 74
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Quatrac +574Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 69 74 Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
Quatrac: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 73.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
Quatrac +474Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 74 ≈ 66 (est.) Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
Quatrac +575Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 72 77 Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Quatrac +976Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Reviews found online 67 76 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source Firehawk AS Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 80 |
| Dry | 70 | 81 |
| Wet | 69 | 91 |
| Snow | 66 | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 74 |
| Noise | 70 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 76 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Firehawk AS
80
/ 100
Quatrac
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B Quatrac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces
Cons
- Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
- Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone Firehawk AS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.
r/MiataNC
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-22
“I just put on a set of Vredestein Quatrac 205/50 R16 from Tire Rack. I am in central Iowa and plan on driving with them all winter.”
gr86.org
·2025-10-10
“Well the wheels are worth roughly $400-500 by themselves in "drive home and remove" condition. Could be a little higher or lower depending on the weather and the tides. Those particular tires look like about $232 each if it's 215/40/18 so half that for all 4 roughly is $500. I sold my 18" premium set off the new car for $1100 but wheels and tires were separated. Would have been $1200 but the doofus who separated the wheels and tires scratched them a little bit so I lowered it some. $372 is much too low on Ebay but $1200 is a good start point in here. They are slightly used but I still wouldn't settle for less than $800 and instead just sit on them until that happens. Don't let people tell you their worthless:”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-06
“How much life left? Vredestein Quatrac all-season tire with over 30.000miles Hi, I have been driving on these Vredestein Quatrac all-season for over 2 years and accumulated over 30.000miles/50.000kms. I read that these tires typically lasts until these milage, however, looking at the tires there seems to be still quite a bit of life left. I measered and got around of 5mm of tread left at the lowest point. Is this normal for an all-season tire to last this long? And how much life do you think these tires have left? Thanks!”
Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 180 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk AS
80
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac scores 91 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac scores 76 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 66 on snow.
Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 70 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology