tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 17 road tests and 26 + 1,583 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac is ahead, 81–73

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac or CrossContact LX25 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac
Tire BVredestein

Quatrac

All Season

± 4

Tests 81 · 17 tests Owners 79 · 1,583 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Quatrac +6
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 17 tests7083
    Reviews found online8378

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83 = 75

    Quatrac: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 81

  2. 80

    Wet

    Quatrac +12
    92
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests≈ 78 (est.)96
    Reviews found online8386

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 80

    Quatrac: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 85.9 = 92

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Quatrac +21
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 12 tests4075
    Reviews found online7173

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40 + 40% × 71.4 = 53

    Quatrac: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 71 (est.)71
    Reviews found online8075

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80 = 76

    Quatrac: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    Quatrac +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 67 (est.)78
    Reviews found online78≈ 67 (est.)

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 71

    Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 74

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Quatrac +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 70 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7678

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72

    Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 78.2 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Reviews found online7977
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests–73
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Vredestein Quatrac
Relative Score 73 81
Dry 75 81
Wet 80 92
Snow 53 74
Comfort 76 73
Noise 71 74
Treadwear 72 75
Handling (owners) 79 77
Efficiency – 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 4

Quatrac

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25QuatracΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.

r/TeslaModelY ·5 upvotes ·2026-10-05

“23 Model Y LR....just did my first tire change at 41k miles from stock Contis to Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Better all the way around, no foam. There is not much of a road noise difference, maybe a bit louder going over concrete sections on some highways. I don't buy into the foam theory. Noise comes from tire composition and tread hitting varying surfaces. Every tire will give a different sound and sound level, foam or not.”
r/electricvehicles ·6 upvotes ·2024-02-24

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Experience?? Has anyone had experience with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ tires? I got them off Tire Rack because they are supposedly EV rated... only to later find out there are specific Quadtrac EV tires (not listed on Tire Rack). I know I'll have a hit on range on my 2022 Bolt EUV because I have the original Michelins on the front and Quadtrac+s in the back but it seems very unpredictable (only reason for this is that old fronts were in VERY bad shape and wanted two new tires for safety with a 2year old). Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2019-02-01

“The last week or so here we have received about 12-15 inches of snow. I have these on my 2003 Forester and must say they dig through the snow very well. The only thing that I have found is that they seem a little slick when stopping. Don't stop as well as the Blizzaks on the wife's Galant, but then again they are not a dedicated winter tire either. Have put about 3500 miles on them since July and must say for an all season tire they have performed well in all conditions.”
Top themes
#Ride comfort and low noise#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter capability#Affordable premium alternative#Tread wear and longevity#Shoulder wear and chunking#Rolling resistance and EV range

Based on 64 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Vredestein Quatrac
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4039
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Vredestein Quatrac

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better snow, wet and dry. Pick the Continental CrossContact LX25 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac scores 92 vs 80 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 73 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 92 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 71 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 73 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology