tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 16 + 0 road tests and 1,578 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac is ahead, 80–38

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac or Geolandar G91A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac
Tire AVredestein

Quatrac

All Season

Tests 81 · 16 tests Owners 78 · 1,578 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 82

    Dry

    Quatrac +45
    37
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / – tests83≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online7921

    Quatrac: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 82

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 90

    Wet

    Quatrac +58
    32
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / – tests94≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online8419

    Quatrac: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 83.9 = 90

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 74

    Snow

    Quatrac +26
    48
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests75≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7233

    Quatrac: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 74

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Quatrac +32
    41
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7414

    Quatrac: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 73.8 = 73

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 75

    Noise

    Quatrac +23
    52
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests80≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)29

    Quatrac: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 75

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Quatrac +35
    39
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests72≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online7620

    Quatrac: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 75.7 = 74

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac +56
    23
    Why this score
    SourceQuatracGeolandar G91A
    Reviews found online7923
Scores at a glance
CategoryVredestein QuatracYokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 80 38
Dry 82 37
Wet 90 32
Snow 74 48
Comfort 73 41
Noise 75 52
Treadwear 74 39
Handling (owners) 79 23

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Quatrac

Geolandar G91A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

Tire B Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.

mdxers.org ·2021-02-02

“I have used Vredestein Quatrac on my 2012 Camry Hybrid XLE. The car has about 130K miles on it and about 50k on the Vredestein Quatrac. Amazing tires ! M+S rated and excellent traction and grip in rain and snow. Wear a bit faster though. Lasted about 45k miles on my Camry . These are my preferred tires for this car.”
r/toyotacrownsignia ·5 upvotes ·2026-10-09

“I would actually disagree with that. All OEM tires are bad. But those Japanese Turanza EL450 are one of the better ones out there. They were super harsh in the beginning, got better over time. Still quite stiff and all that. However there are two things to point out: You got a slightly wider tire. If you know what you are doing, then good for you. For others, I'd generally suggest to stay with OEM sizing (yes there are barely any tires available in that size). Pointless to compare soft All Weather tires with Eco-specific All-Season tires. Those eco all seasons always will be stiffer. For others, may I suggest Vredestein Quatrac Pro, they are available in the factory size and I run them on my other car - they are amazing and IMO much better than CrossClimate2”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-01-23

“My wife has been using Vredestein Quatracs for 4 years now. She has done 60,000 km so far (mostly commuting and school runs, but also several longer trips). The tyres still have plenty od tread. During this winter they will reach the winter indicators and they will definitely last through the next summer, so it will be more than 4.5 years and approximately 70,000 km. So far, they have been very good, quiet, very grippy in the wet and fine even in the occasional snow. The car is a small crossover - Opel Mokka, so pretty different to your 325i :) I can definitely recommend them!”
Top themes
#Ride comfort and low noise#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter capability#Affordable premium alternative#Tread wear and longevity#Shoulder wear and chunking#Rolling resistance and EV range

Based on 64 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available391
Rim diameters15″ – 18″17″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—280 B A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac scores 90 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Quatrac scores 79 vs 23 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac scores 82 vs 37 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 39 on treadwear.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Vredestein Quatrac, 90 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Vredestein Quatrac, 82 vs 37 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 52 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac or Geolandar G91A?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology