Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 60 reviews
Vredestein Sportrac 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Vredestein Sportrac 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
Sportrac 3 leads, 75–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Sportrac 3 +271Why this score
Source Sportrac 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 73 Sportrac 3: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 73
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
No road tests of dry for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
81
Wet
Sportrac 3 +675Why this score
Source Sportrac 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 85 76 Sportrac 3: 60% × 78.5 (est.) + 40% × 84.8 = 81
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +374Why this score
Source Sportrac 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 76 Sportrac 3: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 71.8 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source Sportrac 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 67 Sportrac 3: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 67
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Level76Why this score
Source Sportrac 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 76 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Sportrac 3 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 72 |
| Dry | 73 | 71 |
| Wet | 81 | 75 |
| Comfort | 71 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Sportrac 3
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sportrac 3
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Predictable and progressive grip characteristics
- Strong steering response and handling feedback
Cons
- Increased road noise, often described as a 'humming' or bearing-like sound
- Rapid tread wear reported by spirited drivers
- Soft sidewall construction which may feel unstable during aggressive cornering
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Sportrac 3 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Vredestein Sportrac 3
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Vredestein Sportrac 3 — better wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if comfort matters most to you.
Vredestein Sportrac 3 scores 81 vs 75 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 71 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sportrac 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Sportrac 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Vredestein Sportrac 3, 81 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sportrac 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Sportrac 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sportrac 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology