Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 99 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

T-Trac 2 is ahead, 73–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    T-Trac 2 +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 71 (est.)58
    Reviews found online7668

    T-Trac 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 73

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 67.6 = 62

    No road tests of dry for T-Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    T-Trac 2 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 74 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7772

    T-Trac 2: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    No road tests of wet for T-Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    T-Trac 2 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)61
    Reviews found online7269

    T-Trac 2: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71

    BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 69 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for T-Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–64
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 72

    Treadwear

    T-Trac 2 +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7552

    T-Trac 2: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for T-Trac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    T-Trac 2 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Reviews found online7469
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein T-Trac 2Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Relative Score 73 65
Dry 73 62
Wet 75 69
Comfort 71 66
Noise – 65
Treadwear 72 61
Handling (owners) 74 69
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

T-Trac 2

± 10

BluEarth RV02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryT-Trac 2BluEarth RV02ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/14 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 #7/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A T-Trac 2

Pros

  • High comfort levels and smooth ride over bumps
  • Good overall grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for money and attractive pricing

Cons

  • Wet grip is acceptable but lags behind top-tier premium alternatives
  • Can be slightly noisy on rougher road surfaces
  • Stock availability issues reported by some buyers
All owner themes in the T-Trac 2 review

Tire B BluEarth RV02

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
  • Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
All owner themes in the BluEarth RV02 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein T-Trac 2 B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available94
Rim diameters13″ – 15″17″ – 18″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein T-Trac 2

Yokohama BluEarth RV02

Winner: Vredestein T-Trac 2 — better dry, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein T-Trac 2 scores 73 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein T-Trac 2 scores 72 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein T-Trac 2 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein T-Trac 2 scores 71 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Vredestein T-Trac 2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

T-Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Which is better in the wet, T-Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein T-Trac 2, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, T-Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein T-Trac 2, 73 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, T-Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein T-Trac 2, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, T-Trac 2 or BluEarth RV02?

Vredestein T-Trac 2, 72 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology