Yokohama BluEarth 1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs Yokohama BluEarth 1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 192 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Ultrac Vorti

Summer

± 5

Tests 79 · 14 tests Owners 84 · 192 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Yokohama BluEarth 1
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth 1

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests83–
    Reviews found online90–

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 89.7 = 86

  2. 84

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests84–
    Reviews found online85–

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 83.6 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

  3. 80

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests77–
    Reviews found online82–

    Ultrac Vorti: 40% × 77.4 + 60% × 81.6 = 80

  4. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests71–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac Vorti. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 74

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests72–
    Reviews found online78–

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 78.1 = 74

  6. 88

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Reviews found online88–
  7. 25

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac VortiBluEarth 1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests25–
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs Yokohama BluEarth 1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Ultrac VortiYokohama BluEarth 1
Relative Score 82 –
Dry 86 –
Wet 84 –
Comfort 80 –
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 74 –
Handling (owners) 88 –
Efficiency 25 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ultrac Vorti

BluEarth 1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ultrac Vorti

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • High value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Excellent steering feedback and driver confidence

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or on heavy rear-wheel-drive/high-power vehicles
  • Wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance considered inferior to top competitors like Michelin or Continental by a minority of users
  • Stiff sidewalls on low-profile sizes can negatively impact comfort or lead to cupping
All owner themes in the Ultrac Vorti review

Tire B BluEarth 1

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Even wear patterns across the set
  • Strong wet-weather confidence when new

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread wears down
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
  • Performance taper toward the end of the service life
All owner themes in the BluEarth 1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti B · Yokohama BluEarth 1
CategorySummerSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available42—
Rim diameters18″ – 24″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Yokohama BluEarth 1

Only Vredestein Ultrac Vorti has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth 1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology