Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs Continental VikingContact 7 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 30 + 8 road tests and 31 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Wintrac Pro is ahead, 77–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Wintrac Pro

Winter

± 5

Tests 72 · 30 tests Owners 82 · 31 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)

Continental VikingContact 7
± 5

Tests 75 · 8 tests Owners 62 · 33 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Wintrac Pro +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 8 tests7477
    Reviews found online8351

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 82.5 = 77

    VikingContact 7: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 50.7 = 66

  2. 87

    Wet

    Wintrac Pro +19
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 8 tests8769
    Reviews found online8866

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 87

    VikingContact 7: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 65.7 = 68

  3. 79

    Snow

    Wintrac Pro +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 8 tests7879
    Reviews found online7972

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 78.4 + 40% × 79.2 = 79

    VikingContact 7: 60% × 79 + 40% × 72.2 = 76

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Wintrac Pro +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6070
    Reviews found online8171

    Wintrac Pro: 40% × 59.7 + 60% × 80.6 = 72

    VikingContact 7: 40% × 70 + 60% × 70.6 = 70

  5. 60

    Noise

    VikingContact 7 +20
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 6 tests5588
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)68

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 55.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60

    VikingContact 7: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 68.4 = 80

    No owner ratings of noise for Wintrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Wintrac Pro +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests57≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8056

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 80.4 = 66

    VikingContact 7: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Wintrac Pro +17
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Reviews found online8164
  8. 44

    Efficiency

    VikingContact 7 +33
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWintrac ProVikingContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 4 tests4477
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs Continental VikingContact 7: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Wintrac ProContinental VikingContact 7
Relative Score 77 69
Dry 77 66
Wet 87 68
Snow 79 76
Comfort 72 70
Noise 60 80
Treadwear 66 60
Handling (owners) 81 64
Efficiency 44 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Wintrac Pro

± 5

VikingContact 7

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWintrac ProVikingContact 7ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% #6/8 · 2023 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test R17 70% #9/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% #11/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 80% #2/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 97% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 80% #2/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #8/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 80% #3/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 58% #5/8 · 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test 70% #5/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Ice Braking Snow 96% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 96% #4/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 90% #3/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 100% #1/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 93% #6/8 · 2023 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/5 · 2023 Autoreview Studless Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Exterior Noise Noise 97% #5/8 · 2023 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test R17 100% #1/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #7/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 100% #3/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 95% #12/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 96% #4/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 83% #6/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/17 · 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 90% #4/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test 69% #5/8 · 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test R18 #2/15 2025 Teknikens Värld Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Wintrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
  • Strong performance in cold, dry conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
  • Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
  • Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
All owner themes in the Wintrac Pro review

Tire B VikingContact 7

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong performance in slush and deep snow
  • Stable and predictable handling at highway speeds

Cons

  • Mixed reports regarding tread life and longevity
  • Noticeable decline in ice-braking performance compared to top-tier ice specialists
  • Compound may harden or performance may degrade after multiple seasons
All owner themes in the VikingContact 7 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Wintrac Pro B · Continental VikingContact 7
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available119134
Rim diameters17″ – 22″14″ – 22″
Tread depth—10 - 11/32″
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—44 - 51 psi
Sizes in common8787

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Continental VikingContact 7

Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Continental VikingContact 7 if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental VikingContact 7 scores 77 vs 44 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Continental VikingContact 7 scores 80 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 87 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 81 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Tire B · Continental VikingContact 7

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Which is better in the wet, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 87 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 77 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 79 vs 76 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Continental VikingContact 7, 80 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 66 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Wintrac Pro or VikingContact 7?

Continental VikingContact 7, 77 vs 44 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology