tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama A008P vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 5 + 2,201 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: A008P and ADVAN Fleva V701 are level at 65.

Check price on Amazon · A008P Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama A008P
Tire AYokohama

A008P

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 5 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,201 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 70 (est.)78
    Reviews found online7268

    A008P: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 71

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.6 = 74

    No road tests of dry for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 66

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6464

    A008P: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

    No road tests of wet for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 51

    Snow

    A008P +15
    36
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online3712

    A008P: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.9 = 51

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 36

    No road tests of snow for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    A008P +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7161

    A008P: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 62

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)74
    Reviews found online5560

    A008P: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 59.5 = 68

    No road tests of noise for A008P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 63 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5859

    A008P: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7172
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceA008PADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama A008PYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 65 65
Dry 71 74
Wet 66 67
Snow 51 36
Comfort 70 62
Noise 62 68
Treadwear 61 69
Handling (owners) 71 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

A008P

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A A008P

Pros

  • Exceptional handling and high-speed stability, with one reviewer saying the tires could go faster than the car allowed
  • Quiet operation, noted by a a retailer reviewer
  • Strong driver confidence and road feel, with one owner saying they carried more speed through corners

Cons

  • Difficulty balancing, reported by two reviewers
  • Road force balancing revealed tires out of spec, including one that could not be balanced and two that were way out of spec in another set
  • Vibration and shaking persisted after standard balancing attempts and suspension component changes
All owner themes in the A008P review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama A008P

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama A008P B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available370
Rim diameters16″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG240 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama A008P

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Too close to call: Yokohama A008P and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama A008P is stronger on snow and comfort. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on treadwear, noise and dry. Yokohama A008P rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama A008P scores 51 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A008P scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 62 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama A008P
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama A008P, 51 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama A008P, 70 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, A008P or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology