Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 37 reviews
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Advan dB V552 is ahead, 62–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Advan dB V552 +555Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 56 48 -
64
Wet
Advan dB V552 +757Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 61 53 -
68
Comfort
Advan dB V552 +1454Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 67 38 -
60
Treadwear
Bluearth E51 +464Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 56 63 -
60
Handling
Advan dB V552 +1545Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 60 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan dB V552 | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 56 |
| Dry | 60 | 55 |
| Wet | 64 | 57 |
| Comfort | 68 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 64 |
| Handling | 60 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advan dB V552
Bluearth E51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Tire B Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 17″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Winner: Yokohama Advan dB V552 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 60 vs 45 on handling.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 68 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 64 vs 57 on wet.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 60 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.