Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Hankook Ventus R-S4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 0 road tests and 2,189 + 211 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus R-S4 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 5

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Hankook Ventus R-S4
Tire BHankook

Ventus R-S4

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 211 reviews

“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Ventus R-S4 +2
    76
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6780

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74

    Ventus R-S4: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76

    No road tests of dry for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 68

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6466

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68

    Ventus R-S4: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 35

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)–
    Reviews found online13–

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6255

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62

    Ventus R-S4: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus R-S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online60–

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Ventus R-S4 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5978

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69

    Ventus R-S4: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus R-S4 +10
    82
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Reviews found online7282
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Ventus R-S4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71–
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Hankook Ventus R-S4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Hankook Ventus R-S4
Relative Score 70 72
Dry 74 76
Wet 68 67
Snow 35 –
Comfort 62 59
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 69 73
Handling (owners) 72 82
Efficiency 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ADVAN Fleva V701

± 7

Ventus R-S4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B Ventus R-S4

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and wear resistance ("wears like iron")
  • Highly consistent performance and resistance to overheating or getting greasy during long sessions
  • Stiff sidewalls providing precise steering response and excellent feedback

Cons

  • Slow to come up to optimal operating temperature, especially in cooler weather or for autocross
  • Slightly lower ultimate dry grip compared to top-tier rivals like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS
  • High road noise and a harsh ride due to stiff sidewalls
All owner themes in the Ventus R-S4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus R-S4

Positive

The community holds a very positive view of the Hankook Ventus R-S4, praising its exceptional grip, excellent treadwear, and durability on the track. Users also note that it provides a surprisingly smooth and quiet ride for street use, though some mention it requires heat cycling management as it ages.

r/CarTrackDays ·11 upvotes ·2026-09-15

“Super happy w Hankook Ventus R-S4s. Follow-up question. I'm 10 track days into owning my first set of Hankook Ventus R-S4s. Thanks for the recommendation. I rotate them after every 2 days on my ND miata. I'm noticing the forewarned heat cycling now. TBH - I like them more now. Car moves around more and i have to modulate brakes myself. When they were new I couldn't get the abs engaged - there was just too much grip for the stock equipment. Anyway, my question is - my research says that with this Tire the grip can drop off quickly. Is that accurate? now that I'm getting into this gray area where they are definitely starting to heat cycle out am I going to leave an event Sunday with 80% new level grip and show up to my next track day two Weeks later at 30%? Edit. I’m working with some assumptions here that might not be valid. I’m assuming I’m getting heat cycling performance drop because I was warned I would heat cycle them out before I wore them down to chords. I am definitely experiencing a noticeable drop in mechanical grip during breaking. I am much more capable of getting into the ABS now than I was on the first days on these tires. My last track weekend was also on a set of pads that are near life end so I think that variable is accounted for. That same weekend was cooler than normal and I noticed the performance drop the entire day not, for example, on cold tires or late in a heavy session.”

corvetteforum.com

“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”

Top themes
#exceptional track grip#long treadwear life#heat cycling behavior#smooth and quiet ride#hpde and track day use

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Hankook Ventus R-S4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available70—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Hankook Ventus R-S4

Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better handling and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 82 vs 72 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 73 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 62 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Hankook Ventus R-S4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ventus R-S4?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ventus R-S4?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ventus R-S4?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ventus R-S4?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ventus R-S4?

Hankook Ventus R-S4, 73 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology