Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 40 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 42 road tests and 40 + 2,350 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 82–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,350 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +2684Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 52 79 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 84
No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
61
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +2586Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 89 Reviews found online 58 81 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 89 + 40% × 80.6 = 86
No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison75Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
59
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +1776Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 54 72 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.5 = 59
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 81.8 + 60% × 71.5 = 76
No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 43 Reviews found online – 73 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43 + 40% × 72.7 = 55
-
67
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +1279Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 67 65 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.3 + 40% × 64.9 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
59
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +1978Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 59 78 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 82 |
| Dry | 58 | 84 |
| Wet | 61 | 86 |
| Snow | – | 75 |
| Comfort | 59 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 78 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
ADVAN Neova AD08RS
82
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
- Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
- Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire
Cons
- Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
- Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
- Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.
z4-forum.com
·2022-09-26
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-05-04
“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
cliotrophy.co.uk
·2023-01-23
“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
Top themes
#wet weather grip#braking and safety#sidewall stiffness and comfort#tread wear and longevity#price and value comparison#road noise levels
Based on 16 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 35 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 20 | 20 |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
82
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 58 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 86 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 78 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 76 vs 59 on comfort.
Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 86 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 76 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology