Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 40 reviews
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS vs Kumho Ecsta V730 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS leads, 61–59 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 187 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Ecsta V730 +1573Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 53 76 -
62
Wet
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +2537Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 59 25 -
–
Snow
No comparison50Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online – 37 -
62
Comfort
Level62Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 55 55 -
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online – 63 -
65
Treadwear
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +362Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 65 60 -
60
Handling
Ecsta V730 +868Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 60 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 59 |
| Dry | 58 | 73 |
| Wet | 62 | 37 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 62 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling | 60 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Ecsta V730
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
- Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
- Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire
Cons
- Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
- Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
- Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
Tire B Ecsta V730
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
- High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
- Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | B · Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 35 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Kumho Ecsta V730
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V730 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 62 vs 37 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 73 vs 58 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 68 vs 60 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.