tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE070 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 97 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN NEOVA AD09 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8477

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 84.2 = 75

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6662

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN NEOVA AD09. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6354

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.2 = 65

    Potenza RE070: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.1 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE070. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6464

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN NEOVA AD09. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN NEOVA AD09Potenza RE070
    Reviews found online8175
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Relative Score 70 68
Dry 75 74
Wet 67 64
Snow – 61
Comfort 65 59
Noise – 61
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 81 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ADVAN NEOVA AD09

± 8

Potenza RE070

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN NEOVA AD09

Pros

  • Exceptional heat resistance and consistency during extended track sessions
  • Predictable and communicative handling at the limit
  • Strong wet-weather performance for a 200TW tire

Cons

  • Not as competitive in absolute 'hero' grip as some aggressive 200TW alternatives
  • Can become greasy if over-driven or pushed beyond their thermal operating window
  • High-horsepower vehicles may struggle with traction in lower gears
All owner themes in the ADVAN NEOVA AD09 review

Tire B Potenza RE070

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip approaching track-day tire levels
  • Stiff sidewalls that drastically improve steering response and vehicle handling
  • Great value and affordability compared to other specialty sport tires

Cons

  • Poor performance and hydroplaning tendency in wet weather, standing water, or heavy rain
  • Harsh ride quality around town due to very stiff sidewalls
  • High levels of road noise at everyday speeds
All owner themes in the Potenza RE070 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 B · Bridgestone Potenza RE070
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available54—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—
Tread depth8/32″9/32″
UTQG200 A A140 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09

Bridgestone Potenza RE070

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE070 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 scores 65 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 scores 81 vs 75 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 scores 67 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070?

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09, 67 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070?

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology