Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 6 reviews
Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 118 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport V103 is ahead, 79–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 118 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
Advan Sport V103 +773Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 87 75 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 86.6 = 80
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
82
Wet
Advan Sport V103 +2161Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 79 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 86 58 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.8 = 82
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
76
Comfort
Advan Sport V103 +1165Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 82 62 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 76
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Advan Sport V103 or Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Advan Sport V103 +962Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 74 59 Advan Sport V103: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
85
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport V103 +1669Why this score
Source Advan Sport V103 Parada Spec-2 Reviews found online 85 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan Sport V103 | Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 66 |
| Dry | 80 | 73 |
| Wet | 82 | 61 |
| Comfort | 76 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advan Sport V103
Parada Spec-2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan Sport V103
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and progressive handling at the limit
- Comfortable ride with low noise levels
- Sharper and more acute steering response
Cons
- Sudden drop-off in performance once the tread reaches its wear limit, particularly on the inside edges
- Limited specific feedback on extreme wet weather limits compared to dry performance
Tire B Parada Spec-2
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
- Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
- Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
- Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan Sport V103 | B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 21 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103
Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan Sport V103 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 82 vs 61 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 85 vs 69 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 76 vs 65 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan Sport V103 or Parada Spec-2?
Which is better in the wet, Advan Sport V103 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 82 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan Sport V103 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 80 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan Sport V103 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 76 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan Sport V103 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology