Tests – · none yet Owners 33 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 71–47
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +2070Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 41 71 Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 41.1 = 50
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
46
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +2874Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 37 75 Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 51.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 46
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
36
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 50 (est.) – Reviews found online 15 – Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 49.8 (est.) + 40% × 14.8 = 36
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
46
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +2773Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 34 75 Advan Sport ZPS: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 34.3 = 46
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Advan Sport ZPS or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 25 – Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 25.1 = 50
No road tests of noise for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
45
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +2065Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 54 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 32 65 Advan Sport ZPS: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 32.2 = 45
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport ZPS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
44
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +3175Why this score
Source Advan Sport ZPS BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 44 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 71 |
| Dry | 50 | 70 |
| Wet | 46 | 74 |
| Snow | 36 | – |
| Comfort | 46 | 73 |
| Noise | 50 | – |
| Treadwear | 45 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 44 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
47
/ 100
Advan Sport ZPS
71
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan Sport ZPS
Pros
- Affordable pricing for a run-flat performance tire
- Excellent dry grip and high-speed cornering stability
- Progressive handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Extremely harsh and stiff ride quality
- Unsatisfactory tread life with reports of premature wear
- High road noise
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 180 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
47
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
71
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 44 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 46 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 46 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 50 on dry.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan Sport ZPS or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Advan Sport ZPS or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 46 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan Sport ZPS or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan Sport ZPS or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 46 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan Sport ZPS or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 45 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology