tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Sport vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 32 road tests and 46 + 113 owner reviews. How we score

Different seasons: ADVAN Sport and Blizzak LM005 are each scored against tires of their own season.

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Sport Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM005
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire BBridgestone

Blizzak LM005

Winter

± 5

Tests 73 · 32 tests Owners 59 · 113 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 54 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Blizzak LM005 +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests≈ 60 (est.)77
    Reviews found online4856

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 55.8 = 69

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Blizzak LM005 +31
    89
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 32 tests≈ 61 (est.)100
    Reviews found online5472

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 58

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 100 + 40% × 71.9 = 89

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Blizzak LM005 +13
    73
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 32 tests≈ 64 (est.)79
    Reviews found online5465

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 60

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 64.7 = 73

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 45

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM005 +22
    67
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 63 (est.)78
    Reviews found online3459

    ADVAN Sport: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 34 = 45

    Blizzak LM005: 40% × 78.2 + 60% × 59 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Blizzak LM005 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests≈ 67 (est.)69
    Reviews found online52≈ 67 (est.)

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM005. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 41

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Sport +4
    37
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 52 (est.)34
    Reviews found online2541

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 51.8 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 41

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 34 + 40% × 40.9 = 37

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 45

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM005 +16
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Reviews found online4561
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    82
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN SportBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests–82
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN SportBridgestone Blizzak LM005
Relative Score 53 69
Dry 55 69
Wet 58 89
Snow 60 73
Comfort 45 67
Noise 61 68
Treadwear 41 37
Handling (owners) 45 61
Efficiency – 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ADVAN Sport

± 5

Blizzak LM005

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN SportBlizzak LM005ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #26/44 2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test #8/16 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling performance
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Predictable behavior when pushed near the limit

Cons

  • Unacceptably high and intrusive road noise
  • Very rapid tread wear with many reporting early replacement under 10,000 miles
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport review

Tire B Blizzak LM005

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on wet roads and heavy rain
  • High driving comfort with low interior noise levels when new
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users reporting the tire wearing out within 5,000 to 15,000 km
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice grip by the second or third season
  • Increased tire noise, whining, or humming vibrations as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM005 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
CategorySummerWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3165
Rim diameters19″ – 20″14″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG180 A A—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Built for different seasons: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is a winter tire, Yokohama ADVAN Sport a summer tire. Each score is measured against tires of its own season, so the two are not ranked against each other — pick by the season you drive in.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology