tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 93 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 69–56

Check price on Amazon · Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +13
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7153

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.5 = 71

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.1 = 58

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +10
    60
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7257

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 60

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6640

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    Ventus V12 evo2 +10
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)57

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 63

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Ventus V12 evo2 +16
    47
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6034

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.9 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V12 evo2 +20
    49
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Sport
    Reviews found online6949
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo2Yokohama ADVAN Sport
Relative Score 69 56
Dry 71 58
Wet 70 60
Snow – 61
Comfort 67 54
Noise 73 63
Treadwear 63 47
Handling (owners) 69 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus V12 evo2

ADVAN Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus V12 evo2ADVAN SportΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test #26/44 2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Tire B ADVAN Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling performance
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Predictable behavior when pushed near the limit

Cons

  • Unacceptably high and intrusive road noise
  • Very rapid tread wear with many reporting early replacement under 10,000 miles
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available383
Rim diameters15″ – 21″19″ – 20″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Yokohama ADVAN Sport

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 69 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 63 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 70 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 73 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Sport?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 63 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology