Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 80 reviews
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 84–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 32 tests Owners 82 · 21,504 reviews
“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +2192Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 98 Reviews found online 74 84 -
74
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +1185Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 76 87 -
65
Snow
CrossClimate 2 +2489Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 97 Reviews found online 62 76 -
71
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +172Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 65 Reviews found online 73 83 -
69
Noise
CrossClimate 2 +1180Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 79 Reviews found online 73 80 -
69
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +1180Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 79 Reviews found online 71 81 -
74
Handling
CrossClimate 2 +680Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CrossClimate 2 Reviews found online 74 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 84 |
| Dry | 71 | 92 |
| Wet | 74 | 85 |
| Snow | 65 | 89 |
| Comfort | 71 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 80 |
| Handling | 74 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
AVID Ascend
CrossClimate 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID Ascend
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
- Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
- Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
- Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
Tire B CrossClimate 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
- Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
- Long-lasting tread wear and durability
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
- Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama AVID Ascend
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising its exceptional wet-weather grip, impressive winter and snow performance, and comfortable ride quality. While a minority of users report mixed experiences regarding road noise, potential MPG/efficiency drops, or limited benefits in mild climates without snow, the vast majority consider it a gold-standard all-weather tire.
“My Official review of the Cross Climate 2 tires. I put some new shoes on the Outback after reading some threads on here and decided with my weather here in Missouri the Cross Climate 2s were the best fit. In rain, they are great so no more sliding or hydroplaning what so ever. In snow, they are even more amazing. They grip extremely well. The one downside to them that concerns me, and I didn't think about this when I purchased them, is that fact you can't do a full tire rotation to them like conventional tires as they are directional so you can only do front to back and vise versa. For this reason I am concerned if I will get 60K out of them and avoid the inner/outer wear. Sure you can dismount the tire from the wheel and remount them but I had heard that's bad for them. Overall, they are excellent. If you are concerned about the tire rotation thing, I would say the Michelin Defenders or the Falkan Wildpeaks are probably a better bet. I plan on getting the Falkans next but hopefully that wont be for at least 50K more miles. Read more”
“On a 2015 Highlander Hybrid, the CC2 is excellent anti-hydroplaning, wonderful snow and ice handling, both moving and stopping. I am a rideshare driver averaging 200 or so miles per day. The tires are only just now a bit noisier at 78,000 miles. Wear is down to 3/32 and went through a wild, heavy rain storm today with no lack of confidence whatsoever. Only downside is that >80 degrees F and gas mileage goes down by 2 mpg. Love the tires so much that I feel the slight loss during summer is still worth it.”
“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”
Based on 404 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 89 vs 65 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 92 vs 71 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 85 vs 74 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 69 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.