Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama AVID S34F vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 0 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama AVID S34F
Tire AYokohama

AVID S34F

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · none yet

Yokohama BluEarth S34
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth S34

All Season Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Not enough data yet to score these two side by side

We need test results or owner reviews in at least one shared category for both tires. What we know about each is on its own page.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AVID S34F

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B BluEarth S34

Pros

  • Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
  • Low rolling resistance design

Cons

  • Poor wet weather performance and traction
  • High levels of road noise
  • Mediocre handling characteristics
All owner themes in the BluEarth S34 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID S34F B · Yokohama BluEarth S34
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama AVID S34F

Yokohama BluEarth S34

Neither tire has enough test or review data for a Relative Score yet.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID S34F
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth S34

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology