Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 6 reviews
Yokohama AVS dB v550 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama dB super E spec looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama AVS dB v550 vs Yokohama dB super E spec — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
AVS dB v550 is ahead, 70–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
AVS dB v550 +1259Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 73 54 AVS dB v550: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
dB super E spec: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 59
No road tests of dry for AVS dB v550. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
AVS dB v550 +1458Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 73 53 AVS dB v550: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
dB super E spec: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
No road tests of wet for AVS dB v550. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
72
Comfort
AVS dB v550 +1062Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 74 59 AVS dB v550: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 74.1 = 72
dB super E spec: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
No road tests of comfort for AVS dB v550 or dB super E spec. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
AVS dB v550 +558Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 dB super E spec Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 61 53 AVS dB v550: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63
dB super E spec: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for AVS dB v550. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for dB super E spec. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
AVS dB v550 +1656Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 dB super E spec Reviews found online 72 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVS dB v550 | Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 59 |
| Dry | 71 | 59 |
| Wet | 72 | 58 |
| Comfort | 72 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
AVS dB v550
dB super E spec
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVS dB v550
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and softness
- Excellent tread life and durability
Cons
- Susceptibility to tramlining due to directional tread pattern
- Soft sidewalls may struggle with rough or aggressive road surfaces
- Limited availability in certain markets and sizes
Tire B dB super E spec
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Reliable dry weather grip
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of rapid wear
- Poor performance in snow and slushy conditions
- Average wet weather traction compared to premium competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVS dB v550 | B · Yokohama dB super E spec |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVS dB v550
Yokohama dB super E spec
Winner: Yokohama AVS dB v550 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama AVS dB v550 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama dB super E spec rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama AVS dB v550 scores 72 vs 56 on handling.
Yokohama AVS dB v550 scores 72 vs 58 on wet.
Yokohama AVS dB v550 scores 71 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama AVS dB v550 scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVS dB v550 or dB super E spec?
Which is better in the wet, AVS dB v550 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama AVS dB v550, 72 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVS dB v550 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama AVS dB v550, 71 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, AVS dB v550 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama AVS dB v550, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AVS dB v550 or dB super E spec?
Yokohama AVS dB v550, 63 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology