Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 6 reviews
Yokohama AVS Sport vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 6 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
AVS Sport leads, 74–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Level75Why this score
Source AVS Sport BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 80 83 AVS Sport: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
No road tests of dry for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
AVS Sport +272Why this score
Source AVS Sport BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 75 80 AVS Sport: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 79.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
AVS Sport +566Why this score
Source AVS Sport BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 73 68 AVS Sport: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 68.1 = 66
No road tests of comfort for AVS Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source AVS Sport BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 87 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 79
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
AVS Sport +662Why this score
Source AVS Sport BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 70 75 AVS Sport: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
80
Handling (owners)
Level80Why this score
Source AVS Sport BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online 80 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVS Sport | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 75 |
| Wet | 74 | 72 |
| Comfort | 71 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVS Sport
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVS Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet weather traction
- High level of handling precision and cornering confidence
- Impressive tread life relative to its performance category
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly during the first half of the tread life
- Limited availability due to the tire being out of production
- Performance degradation noted when tread depth reaches the final 2mm
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVS Sport | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 38 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVS Sport
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Narrow edge: Yokohama AVS Sport — better treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama AVS Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 68 vs 62 on treadwear.
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 71 vs 66 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVS Sport or BluEarth XT AE61?
Which is better in the wet, AVS Sport or BluEarth XT AE61?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVS Sport or BluEarth XT AE61?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, AVS Sport or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama AVS Sport, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AVS Sport or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama AVS Sport, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology