tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Continental UltraContact — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 60 + 1,329 owner reviews. How we score

UltraContact is ahead, 76–71

Check price on Amazon · UltraContact or BluEarth Es ES32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental UltraContact
Tire BContinental

UltraContact

Summer

± 5

Tests 79 · 1 test Owners 75 · 1,329 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)

“Im normalen täglichen Gebrauch wirst du keinen Unterschied feststellen. Den Ultra Contact verkaufe ich hauptsächlich an Vielfahrer da aus ihm etwas mehr Laufleistung rauszuholen ist. Ansonsten triffst du mit keinem Continental die falsche Wahl.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    UltraContact +8
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32UltraContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)80
    Reviews found online7175

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    UltraContact: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 74.7 = 78

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    UltraContact +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32UltraContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 73 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7577

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    UltraContact: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 77.3 = 75

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Comfort

    UltraContact +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32UltraContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    UltraContact: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32 or UltraContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    UltraContact +14
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32UltraContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6573

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    UltraContact: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 79

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 75

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32UltraContact
    Reviews found online7570
  6. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32UltraContact
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–73
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Continental UltraContact
Relative Score 71 76
Dry 70 78
Wet 74 75
Comfort 73 74
Treadwear 65 79
Handling (owners) 75 70
Efficiency – 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

± 5

UltraContact

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Tire B UltraContact

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth performance
  • Low noise levels and quiet highway cruising
  • Strong traction and confidence-inspiring grip in wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to reduced steering feedback and vague handling
  • Prone to feeling 'push-y' or inducing understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some mid-range competitors
All owner themes in the UltraContact review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental UltraContact

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental UltraContact line is mixed to cautiously positive. Drivers appreciate its quietness, comfort, high EU label ratings (especially on the NXT variant), and high mileage potential for frequent drivers, but some express skepticism about sustainability-focused marketing, tread design for adverse conditions, and overall performance compared to dedicated premium or EV models.

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2024-12-05

“I am driving an ev with factory size 215/55/r18 and this ultracontact nxt is the only tyres with A rated interms of energy efficiency and noise level. Sadly cant get this in my country.”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2024-12-24

“Continental ultracontact Anyone knows if this tire is ditectional? I suspect that my tires on backwards because the tread pattern does not match left and right. See pic ..”
bobistheoilguy.com ·1 upvote ·2023-06-25

“Looks like some sort of eco appealing tire. THE MOST SUSTAINABLE TIRE! (last on my priority of what I want from a tire) Probably not great in winter.. if you have winter.. tread pattern looks too solid with no voids.. good for noise.. not great for snow or slush.”
Top themes
#energy efficiency ratings#tire lifespan and mileage#cabin noise and comfort#comparison with PremiumContact#EV tire compatibility#sustainability and eco design

Based on 19 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Continental UltraContact
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6494
Rim diameters13″ – 18″14″ – 20″
Sizes in common5151

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Continental UltraContact

Winner: Continental UltraContact — better treadwear and dry. Where the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental UltraContact scores 79 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental UltraContact scores 78 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental UltraContact
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BluEarth Es ES32 or UltraContact?

Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or UltraContact?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or UltraContact?

Continental UltraContact, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or UltraContact?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or UltraContact?

Continental UltraContact, 79 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology