Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +1851Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 49 Reviews found online 70 54 -
72
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +2250Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 46 Reviews found online 73 56 -
72
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +963Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 S fit EQ Reviews found online 74 56 -
–
Noise
No comparison56Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 49 -
65
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +362Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) – 64 Reviews found online 65 59 -
73
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +2449Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 S fit EQ Reviews found online 73 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 54 |
| Dry | 69 | 51 |
| Wet | 72 | 50 |
| Comfort | 72 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 56 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling | 73 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
BluEarth Es ES32
S fit EQ
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Tire B S fit EQ
Pros
- Attractive price point offering high value for money
- Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
- Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
- Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
- Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Laufenn S fit EQ
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 49 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 50 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 51 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.