Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama Advan S.T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +1851Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Advan S.T Reviews found online 70 41 -
72
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +2250Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Advan S.T Reviews found online 73 43 -
72
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +2448Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Advan S.T Reviews found online 74 28 -
65
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +2045Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Advan S.T Reviews found online 65 31 -
73
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +3538Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Advan S.T Reviews found online 73 38
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Yokohama Advan S.T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 47 |
| Dry | 69 | 51 |
| Wet | 72 | 50 |
| Comfort | 72 | 48 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 45 |
| Handling | 73 | 38 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
BluEarth Es ES32
Advan S.T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Tire B Advan S.T
Cons
- Poor structural integrity leading to premature bulges and distortions
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- High price point relative to performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Yokohama Advan S.T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 64 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Yokohama Advan S.T
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 38 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 48 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 50 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 45 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.