tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 63 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 72–65

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth RV02 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)58
    Reviews found online7368

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 67.6 = 62

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 74 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7672

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)61
    Reviews found online7669

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 69 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–64
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 67

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6752

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 77

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Reviews found online7769
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Relative Score 72 65
Dry 71 62
Wet 75 69
Comfort 74 66
Noise – 65
Treadwear 67 61
Handling (owners) 77 69
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

± 10

BluEarth RV02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Tire B BluEarth RV02

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
  • Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
All owner themes in the BluEarth RV02 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available644
Rim diameters13″ – 18″17″ – 18″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Yokohama BluEarth RV02

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better dry, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth RV02?

Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology