tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 60 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth XT AE61 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth XT AE61 or BluEarth Es ES32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth XT AE61

Summer

± 7

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    BluEarth XT AE61 +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7183

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 73 (est.)68
    Reviews found online7583

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 83.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)65
    Reviews found online7569

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    BluEarth XT AE61: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 69.2 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–87
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 79

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)53
    Reviews found online6577

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 75

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth XT AE61 +7
    82
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Reviews found online7582
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–65
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Relative Score 71 73
Dry 70 76
Wet 74 74
Comfort 73 67
Noise – 79
Treadwear 65 62
Handling (owners) 75 82
Efficiency – 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

± 7

BluEarth XT AE61

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Tire B BluEarth XT AE61

Pros

  • Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Responsive and sharp steering handling
  • High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction

Cons

  • Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
  • Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
  • Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
All owner themes in the BluEarth XT AE61 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available6438
Rim diameters13″ – 18″16″ – 20″
Sizes in common1111

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling and dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 82 vs 75 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 76 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 76 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology