Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth XT AE61 leads, 71–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 79 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
BluEarth XT AE61 +675Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 70 83 -
72
Wet
BluEarth XT AE61 +173Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 73 80 -
72
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +666Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 65 Reviews found online 74 68 -
–
Noise
No comparison80Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 89 -
65
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +362Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 53 Reviews found online 65 76 -
73
Handling
BluEarth XT AE61 +780Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online 73 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 75 |
| Wet | 72 | 73 |
| Comfort | 72 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 80 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling | 73 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
BluEarth Es ES32
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 64 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Too close to call: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is stronger on handling and dry.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 80 vs 73 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.