tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–61

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7158

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +15
    57
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7353

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7462

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6564

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 73

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +15
    58
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7358
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 70 61
Dry 70 61
Wet 72 57
Comfort 72 65
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 73 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

BluEarth Es ES32

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available64—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology