tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV vs Continental CrossContact LX25 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 171 + 26 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Geolandar G91AV 74, CrossContact LX25 73.

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar G91AV Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Geolandar G91AV +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 74 (est.)70
    Reviews found online8184

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 77

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.5 = 76

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +8
    80
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 78 (est.)
    Reviews found online7384

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.9 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 80

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Snow

    Geolandar G91AV +20
    53
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)40
    Reviews found online7472

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 73

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7980

    Geolandar G91AV: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7478

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G91AV +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7976

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar G91AV +2
    79
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar G91AVCrossContact LX25
    Reviews found online8179
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama Geolandar G91AVContinental CrossContact LX25
Relative Score 74 73
Dry 77 76
Wet 72 80
Snow 73 53
Comfort 76 77
Noise 70 71
Treadwear 74 72
Handling (owners) 81 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Geolandar G91AV

± 7

CrossContact LX25

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Geolandar G91AV

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
  • Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
  • Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting

Cons

  • Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
  • Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
  • Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
All owner themes in the Geolandar G91AV review

Tire B CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV B · Continental CrossContact LX25
CategoryAll-SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available240
Rim diameters17″ – 18″16″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″10 - 12/32″
UTQG280 B A740 A A - B
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure51 psi44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV

Continental CrossContact LX25

Too close to call: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV and Continental CrossContact LX25 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Geolandar G91AV is stronger on snow. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 73 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Which is better in the wet, Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 73 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Geolandar G91AV or CrossContact LX25?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology