Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 35 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Geolandar H/T G056 is ahead, 68–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 559 reviews
“Gouge on sidewall It’s a continental cross contact LX sport 235/65 R18. Got them last year but hit a sharp curb the other day. Not sure if I’m seeing any cords, there’s some white streaks deep in the gouge but it all seems in tact. Just need to drive this car for 3 more days, is it safe?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +1259Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 74 54 -
70
Wet
Geolandar H/T G056 +961Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 70 58 -
58
Snow
CrossContact LX Sport +260Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 51 54 -
70
Comfort
Geolandar H/T G056 +763Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 70 58 -
69
Noise
Geolandar H/T G056 +564Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 72 61 -
66
Treadwear
Geolandar H/T G056 +2343Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 66 27 -
69
Handling
Geolandar H/T G056 +2247Why this score
Source Geolandar H/T G056 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 69 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 55 |
| Dry | 71 | 59 |
| Wet | 70 | 61 |
| Snow | 58 | 60 |
| Comfort | 70 | 63 |
| Noise | 69 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 43 |
| Handling | 69 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Geolandar H/T G056
CrossContact LX Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinions on the Continental CrossContact LX Sport are mixed, with some owners praising their handling, quiet ride, and role as OEM equipment, while others report disappointment, premature wear, and sidewall durability issues. They are frequently compared to newer alternatives like the Hankook iON evo AS SUV and Michelin CrossClimate2, particularly in EV efficiency discussions.
“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”
“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”
“You don’t want to be too cheap with harder rubber material because they lack stability. I just replaced mine with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport T1 from America Tires with the best balance between comfort and control. Slightly cheaper than Tesla Service Center. You can try the Hankook Evo ION designed specifically for EV but you only have half the warranty mileage due to staggered tires configuration on the MX.”
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 56 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 720 A A | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 66 vs 43 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 69 vs 47 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 70 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.