Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 16 + 865 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Geolandar X-CV G057 70, Quatrac Pro+ 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

Quatrac Pro+

All Season

± 6

Tests 69 · 14 tests Owners 73 · 865 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“2024 Prius XLE w/17in. wheel and tire downsize. I recently swapped out the 19in OEM wheels and tires for 225/55r17 Verdestien Quatrac Pro+ mounted on Borbet Type W wheels (anthracite). I don't have a ton of mileage on them, but so far, I'm pretty happy with the results. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 72 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7876

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 75

    Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 75.9 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Quatrac Pro+ +4
    81
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 75 (est.)80
    Reviews found online7981

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 77

    Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 81.1 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 50

    Snow

    Quatrac Pro+ +16
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 60 (est.)64
    Reviews found online3769

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50

    Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 68.5 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 70 (est.)66
    Reviews found online7471

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.5 = 72

    Quatrac Pro+: 40% × 66.1 + 60% × 71.3 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    Quatrac Pro+ +7
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 66 (est.)82
    Reviews found online73≈ 66 (est.)

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 69

    Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6563

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 63.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Reviews found online7676
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar X-CV G057Quatrac Pro+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests–53
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Geolandar X-CV G057Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Relative Score 70 71
Dry 75 67
Wet 77 81
Snow 50 66
Comfort 72 69
Noise 69 76
Treadwear 66 64
Handling (owners) 76 76
Efficiency – 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Geolandar X-CV G057

± 6

Quatrac Pro+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Crisp handling and responsive steering performance

Cons

  • Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
  • Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar X-CV G057 review

Tire B Quatrac Pro+

Pros

  • Strong wet-weather grip and confidence, including in heavy rain, standing water and emergency braking
  • Planted, precise handling and good dry grip and cornering, often described as sporty
  • Low road noise and good ride comfort, with several reviewers noting they are as quiet as or quieter than previous tires (including Michelin and budget tires)

Cons

  • Not a substitute for a dedicated winter tire; limited in deep fresh snow and criticized as hopeless in winter by one user who bought them by mistake
  • Some wear and durability concerns, including faster wear when driven sportily, hardening over time, and isolated reports of premature damage
  • Less steering feedback and a soft or squishy on-center feel for some drivers of sporty cars
All owner themes in the Quatrac Pro+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

Positive

Community opinion is largely favorable, with owners praising the Quatrac Pro+ for strong wet grip, a quiet and comfortable ride, and good value. Its 3PMSF rating gives better snow capability than regular all-seasons, though many say it leans toward wet and sporty performance rather than deep snow. Critics and comparison posts note that it trails the best all-weather tires, such as the CrossClimate2, and UHP all-seasons, such as the DWS06+, in braking and handling. A few isolated complaints involve shoulder chunking, air loss and a slow leak.

Top themes
#Wet grip#Quiet ride#Ride comfort#Snow capability 3PMSF#Value pricing#Tesla/EV use#vs CrossClimate2/DWS06+#PNW rain use

Based on 65 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
CategoryAll-Season Premium Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available64103
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG520 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common3636

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

Too close to call: Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 and Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 is stronger on dry and comfort. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ is stronger on snow, noise and wet. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 66 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 75 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 76 vs 69 on noise.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 81 vs 77 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Which is better in the wet, Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 66 vs 50 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 76 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Geolandar X-CV G057 or Quatrac Pro+?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology