Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 12 reviews
Avon Storm 3D XM vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Angel GT is ahead, 71–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Angel GT +671Why this score
Source Storm 3D XM Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 72 Storm 3D XM: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Angel GT: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71
No road tests of dry for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
Angel GT +1174Why this score
Source Storm 3D XM Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 60 76 Storm 3D XM: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
Angel GT: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Comfort
Angel GT +670Why this score
Source Storm 3D XM Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 71 Storm 3D XM: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
Angel GT: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Treadwear
Storm 3D XM +266Why this score
Source Storm 3D XM Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 66 Storm 3D XM: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
Angel GT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Storm 3D XM. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Angel GT +1372Why this score
Source Storm 3D XM Angel GT Reviews found online 59 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Storm 3D XM | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 71 |
| Dry | 65 | 71 |
| Wet | 63 | 74 |
| Comfort | 64 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Storm 3D XM
Angel GT
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Avon Storm 3D XM finished ahead 0 times and Pirelli Angel GT 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Storm 3D XM | Angel GT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/7 | #3/7 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2014 Motorrad Premium Touring Motorcycle Tyre Test · 190/55 R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Storm 3D XM
Pros
- High mileage and tread longevity
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability
- Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and lack of confidence
- Vague front-end feedback and 'squirming' sensation
- Tendency to track road grooves and imperfections
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Storm 3D XM | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon Storm 3D XM
Pirelli Angel GT
Winner: Pirelli Angel GT — better handling, wet and dry. Where the Avon Storm 3D XM is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Avon Storm 3D XM rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Angel GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 72 vs 59 on handling.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 74 vs 63 on wet.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 71 vs 65 on dry.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Storm 3D XM or Angel GT?
Which is better in the wet, Storm 3D XM or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 74 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Storm 3D XM or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Storm 3D XM or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Storm 3D XM or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology