tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs Firestone Destination M/T2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, 73–67

Check price on Amazon · All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire ABFGoodrich

All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7568

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7272

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 75

    Snow

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7771

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7160

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    Destination M/T2: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 59.6 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +10
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7348

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 69

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 59

    No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +17
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7750

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Destination M/T2
    Reviews found online69–
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2Firestone Destination M/T2
Relative Score 73 67
Dry 73 68
Wet 72 72
Snow 75 71
Comfort 70 63
Noise 69 59
Treadwear 73 56
Handling (owners) 69 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

All-Terrain T/A KO2

± 8

Destination M/T2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
  • Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
  • Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO2 review

Tire B Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.

r/Trucks ·3 upvotes ·2022-11-17

“Nitto RidgeGrapplers… I had them for 4 years and had tons of tread left after 40000 miles until I got a new job where my truck stayed on that dark asphalt 10 hours a day and they started cracking but I had the 10ply tires as I used to pull a 16ft trailer with mowers all the time… my tires had several small nails in them but it never once had a flat somehow. They do good in the slick stuff although I had 4wd but I only ever drove on ice one time and they did better than I thought. I currently have KO2s… honestly not a fan simply because balancing them is a nightmare for some reason”
wranglerforum.com ·2 upvotes ·2024-04-21

“The Discount Tire website shows they are available in 285/70R17 LR C Raised Black Lettering for $312. The KO2s that match those specs are $307. The KO3 with Raised White Lettering in LR C will be available in August, 2025. Not sure of why the delay. The 285/70R17 tires will fit on a JK with a warning. That size is 11.2" wide vs the stock 255s on most JKs is 10" wide. That extra width can cause some rubbing issues at full lock. You can adjust the stops on the back side of the yoke with will slightly increase your turning radius. If you are considering new wheels as well, wheels with a backspace of 5.2" or less will eliminate the rubbing on some vehicles. I run 285/70R17 BFG KO2s on my 2017 with Quadratec CJ Retro wheels with 5.2" of back space and do not have any rubbing. I have never adjusted my stops and have no lift. (Flat land S. Georgia does not need a lift for 99% of the terrain.)”
r/ToyotaTacoma ·2 upvotes ·2018-12-26

“I’m on my second set of K02’s. They wear quickly depending on how much you drive. But I take my truck out to the desert in Phoenix all the time. I punish my tires. Not one puncture or flat. I would not be caught off roading with anything else. But if you are a concrete cowboy, I would not get them. I would probably go with the Nitto Graplers. Also the Ko2 has that sweet aggressive look. The other tires are curved in giving it a more generic look. Hope that helps. NTA also has a 70 dollar rebate on KO2 i believe.”
Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life

Based on 395 community posts

Tire B

Firestone Destination M/T2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 B · Firestone Destination M/T2
CategoryAll-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4918
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth13 - 15/32″19/32″
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi50 psi
Sizes in common1111

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Firestone Destination M/T2

Winner: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better treadwear, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 59 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology