Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,588 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

All-Terrain T/A KO2 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 1,588 reviews

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7468

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7074

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 71

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7667

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 74

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68

    No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6958

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7260

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64

    No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7772

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online6659
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs General Grabber A/TX: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 72 68
Wet 71 73
Snow 74 68
Comfort 69 61
Noise 69 64
Treadwear 73 70
Handling (owners) 66 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

All-Terrain T/A KO2

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
  • Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
  • Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO2 review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.

r/Jimny ·4 upvotes ·2023-05-13

“Yes, totally fine to run them on the stock 5.5" wide wheels, no rubbing and they're a good option for an upgrade while minimising drawbacks. I ran exactly that size KO2 for ~50,000 km, ended up selling them onto someone else and swapped to different wheels and tyres just for something different.”

r/overlanding ·2 upvotes ·2022-08-11

“I drove to the Deadhorse, Alaska (as far north as you can drive in America). The Dalton highway is a notorious 400 mile gravel road start just north of Fairbanks. Lots of people bring 2 spares. I had 0 flats. KO2 eat snow and sand for breakfast. They definitely improve my Q5 and allow me to hang with proper off-roaders (at least for a little while)”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-06-26

“BFG KO2 - 50k miles, some cracking between tread, slightly uneven wear. Time to replace? BFGoodrich KO2s on a 2021 F150 FX4 max tow. From what I can tell, these were the original tires and have just under 50k miles. Tread depth is technically OK based on the wear indicator. They show some cracking between treads, which may or may not be a problem based on the many threads and opinions here 😅 Bigger problem may be uneven wear. It looks like the original owner missed some regular rotations, and two of the tires (front when I bought the truck) were visibly more rounded than the rear. After 25k of regular 5k rotations it is maybe a little more even but still noticeable. They’re noisy - no surprise with with KO2s - and gas mileage isn’t great. I do tow occasionally - small travel trailer, 6x12 utility trailer, and rarely a pontoon. Time to replace? Or can I make it through another MN winter and replace next year?”

Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life

Based on 395 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

jeepforum.com ·2021-10-12

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”

ram-trx.com ·2025-10-03

“I've got just over 10,000 miles on my General Grabber A/Tx's and I love them. For the terrain I cover, they are great. If you're looking for a mud tire, these aren't going to clean out very well (probably similar to an average A/T like a BFG KO2). But in the deep snow and ice, they've been great. They are also amazingly quiet on the highway, and on loose dirt/gravel they have done really well. I don't have enough miles to tell you how long they will last, but going off how they are wearing right now, I'm optimistic I can get 40,000 miles out of them (I rotate my tires every 4,000 miles).”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4944
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth13 - 15/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common2626

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

General Grabber A/TX

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better comfort, handling and snow. Where the General Grabber A/TX is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 66 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 74 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.

Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 74 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology