tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 370 owner reviews. How we score

All-Terrain T/A KO2 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire ABFGoodrich

All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7275

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74

    No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 75

    Snow

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7767

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 69

    No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7159

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7360

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 64

    No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7772

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO2Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online6958
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 72 69
Dry 73 69
Wet 72 74
Snow 75 69
Comfort 70 63
Noise 69 64
Treadwear 73 70
Handling (owners) 69 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

All-Terrain T/A KO2

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
  • Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
  • Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO2 review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.

r/Jimny ·4 upvotes ·2023-05-13

“Yes, totally fine to run them on the stock 5.5" wide wheels, no rubbing and they're a good option for an upgrade while minimising drawbacks. I ran exactly that size KO2 for ~50,000 km, ended up selling them onto someone else and swapped to different wheels and tyres just for something different.”
r/overlanding ·2 upvotes ·2022-08-11

“I drove to the Deadhorse, Alaska (as far north as you can drive in America). The Dalton highway is a notorious 400 mile gravel road start just north of Fairbanks. Lots of people bring 2 spares. I had 0 flats. KO2 eat snow and sand for breakfast. They definitely improve my Q5 and allow me to hang with proper off-roaders (at least for a little while)”
r/XVcrosstrek ·6 upvotes ·2019-01-31

“I run Hakkapeliittas in the winter (UP of Michigan, 300"+ of snow per year) but I ran my KO2s last winter and they performed surprisingly well. They do struggle in ice and burnished snowpack, especially under 15F in my experience and since they have no siping they don't clear as well as snow tires. If it's KO2s vs. All Seasons I'd go with the KO2s, just know they still don't beat proper snow tires.”
Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life

Based on 395 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
jeepforum.com ·2021-10-12

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
5thgenrams.com ·2019-12-14

“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4944
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth13 - 15/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common2626

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

General Grabber A/TX

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better handling, comfort and snow. Where the General Grabber A/TX is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 75 vs 69 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.

Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 69 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology