Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, 72–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 53 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 58 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 50 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
Grabber HTS: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 49 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
Grabber HTS: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.8 = 55
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 56 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 69
Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 46 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | 54 |
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 58 |
| Dry | 73 | 58 |
| Wet | 72 | 61 |
| Snow | 75 | 58 |
| Comfort | 70 | 55 |
| Noise | 69 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Grabber HTS
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“Nitto RidgeGrapplers… I had them for 4 years and had tons of tread left after 40000 miles until I got a new job where my truck stayed on that dark asphalt 10 hours a day and they started cracking but I had the 10ply tires as I used to pull a 16ft trailer with mowers all the time… my tires had several small nails in them but it never once had a flat somehow. They do good in the slick stuff although I had 4wd but I only ever drove on ice one time and they did better than I thought. I currently have KO2s… honestly not a fan simply because balancing them is a nightmare for some reason”
“The Discount Tire website shows they are available in 285/70R17 LR C Raised Black Lettering for $312. The KO2s that match those specs are $307. The KO3 with Raised White Lettering in LR C will be available in August, 2025. Not sure of why the delay. The 285/70R17 tires will fit on a JK with a warning. That size is 11.2" wide vs the stock 255s on most JKs is 10" wide. That extra width can cause some rubbing issues at full lock. You can adjust the stops on the back side of the yoke with will slightly increase your turning radius. If you are considering new wheels as well, wheels with a backspace of 5.2" or less will eliminate the rubbing on some vehicles. I run 285/70R17 BFG KO2s on my 2017 with Quadratec CJ Retro wheels with 5.2" of back space and do not have any rubbing. I have never adjusted my stops and have no lift. (Flat land S. Georgia does not need a lift for 99% of the terrain.)”
“I’m on my second set of K02’s. They wear quickly depending on how much you drive. But I take my truck out to the desert in Phoenix all the time. I punish my tires. Not one puncture or flat. I would not be caught off roading with anything else. But if you are a concrete cowboy, I would not get them. I would probably go with the Nitto Graplers. Also the Ko2 has that sweet aggressive look. The other tires are curved in giving it a more generic look. Hope that helps. NTA also has a 70 dollar rebate on KO2 i believe.”
Based on 395 community posts
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
“The hts is a great tire, very comfortable, quiet and great for better fuel efficiency being a lrr tire. Although rated as an *** season, if your truck is a 2wd I would highly recommend snow tires. Me personally I would use the general hts tires as a 3 season tire or 4 season if I lived in an area that got minimal snow. Hope this helps”
“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
“i have over 29k miles on my Toyo 19s. i suspect i will get another 10K out of them. out of the box these tires are great. wet traction was awesome as is dry traction still. noise is more than a sedan style tire, it is a 5500 pound vehicle, AKA: a truck. last weekend i traveled back up from SC in a torrential downpour on I-95. easily 6 inches of rain fell that weekend and the roads were awash with puddles and standing water. i noticed some slippage, i actually had to slow to about 60 / 65 mph. when new they handle standing water better. i also have General Grabber HTS tires on one of my work trucks. they seem to be a good low cost tire. i don't drive the truck enough to give a thorough review, but i would buy them again for a work truck. i should get 40K miles from them and they were about $110 for 17s.”
Based on 50 community posts
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
General Grabber HTS
Winner: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better treadwear, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 54 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 75 vs 58 on snow.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 58 on dry.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 58 on our dry score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 58 on our snow score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 55 on our comfort score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology