Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: All-Terrain T/A KO2 72, DynaPro A/TM RF10 71.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Level73Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 76 77 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +274Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
73
Snow
All-Terrain T/A KO2 +865Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 62 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
70
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +272Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +170Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +171Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Level71Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO2 DynaPro A/TM RF10 Reviews found online 71 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 73 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Snow | 73 | 65 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
All-Terrain T/A KO2
71
/ 100
DynaPro A/TM RF10
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 finished ahead 2 times and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/13 | #14/13 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities
Cons
- Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
- Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2021-11-30
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
subaruoutback.org
·6 upvotes ·2022-09-17
“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”
f150forum.com
“I changed my mind on what tire I'm getting. I bought the BFGoodrich All-Terrain KO2 LT in an E1 load rating . Discount tire put my truck specs in and even had new tire placard for the door jam. The new pressure to meet the truck weight and GVWR axle requirements has a recommended tire pressure of 41 psi in the rear and 41 psi in the front. The Goodyear wrangler Adventure with Kevlar C1 load rated LT tires required 45 psi in the rear and 45 psi in the front tires. This due to it's lower rating. Sales manager told me the Goodrich AT KO2 have better on road characteristics, better off road characteristics, and better snow performance. The BFGoodrich AT KO2 were my first choice but didn't think an E1 Load tire would work on my rims. They were the same price as the Goodyear Adventure with Kevlar so I came out good.”
Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life
Based on 395 community posts
Tire B
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
71
/ 100
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Too close to call: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is stronger on snow.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 65 on snow.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology