Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 21 reviews
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 21 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: All-Terrain T/A KO 63, Cross Contact A/T 62.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Level64Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 62 All-Terrain T/A KO: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
61
Wet
Cross Contact A/T +364Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 59 63 All-Terrain T/A KO: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
All-Terrain T/A KO +1253Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 62 41 All-Terrain T/A KO: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 65
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
62
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +365Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 55 60 All-Terrain T/A KO: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 62
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +165Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 All-Terrain T/A KO: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +562Why this score
Source All-Terrain T/A KO Cross Contact A/T Reviews found online 57 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO | Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 62 |
| Dry | 64 | 64 |
| Wet | 61 | 64 |
| Snow | 65 | 53 |
| Comfort | 62 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
All-Terrain T/A KO
Cross Contact A/T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity, with many users reporting tens of thousands of miles
- Superb off-road traction in dirt, mud, and various rugged terrains
- Reliable winter performance with good grip in snow
Cons
- Subpar wet road grip with sudden breakaway characteristics
- Noticeable increase in road noise as the tires wear down
- Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, ranging from rapid wear to extreme longevity
Tire B Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO | B · Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Too close to call: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO and Continental Cross Contact A/T are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO is stronger on snow. Continental Cross Contact A/T is stronger on wet and comfort. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO scores 65 vs 53 on snow.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 61 on wet.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T?
Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology